Re: aio

Andrew Morton (akpm@zip.com.au)
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:36:00 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Chow: "nfsroot dead slow with redhat 7.2"
Previous message: Paul Mackerras: "2.4.17-rc2 BUG at slab.c:1110"
Maybe in reply to: Ben LaHaise: "aio"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: aio"

Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>
> All I need is a set of syscall numbers that aren't going to change
> should this implementation stand up to the test of time.

The aio_* functions are part of POSIX and SUS, so merely reserving
system call numbers for them does not seems a completely dumb
thing to do, IMO.

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Chow: "nfsroot dead slow with redhat 7.2"
Previous message: Paul Mackerras: "2.4.17-rc2 BUG at slab.c:1110"
Maybe in reply to: Ben LaHaise: "aio"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: aio"