Re: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 26 Dec 2001 15:04:40 +0000 (GMT)


> Because it's small, and if it wasn't there, we'd have to have the small
> "rootfs" anyway (which basically duplicated ramfs functionality).

Can ramfs=N longer term actually come back to be "use __init for the RAM
fs functions". That would seem to address any space issues even the most
embedded fanatic has.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/