Ummm, on my Dual P-III (650MHz with 524988416 Bytes), my current Seti
efficiency is 5.35 CpF. That's a tad high/slower than an Ultra Sparc IIi
according to their stats. So, it would appear that being SMP is hurting my
performance a bit. Unless that is that you meant to run a seti instance for
each CPU? And this reminds me of how "make -j3 bzlilo" is slower than
"make -j2 bzlilo".
> So these issues will be very much in the mainstream of all users. No
> way to deny this.
> I have no fear: this is a reachable goal, let's just take it.
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
> PS: Yes, Alan, I read your mail about the 32GB box and DMA and stuff,
> but nevertheless we should keep up with the market-ongoings (damn
> cheap 1GB modules).
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- timothy.covell@ashavan.org. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/