> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>We've also proved the DMI data is too unreliable to be used, so the entire
>>problem space is irrelevant
>>
>
> That's not a problem, remember Eric volunteered to maintain the
> enormous black list 8-)
>
Surelly I will not maintain the DMI table!
It is already difficult to maintain the database of CPU.
The newer CPUs have name stored directly in CPU and no more
in kernel :-(
(
This is a call for help: how to write a table
CPU - CONFIG_SYMBOL ?
Now I use Vendor/Name/Family/Stepping/, but
maybe with Vendor + flags (CPUID flags) the result
will be more correct?
Other suggestions?
giacomo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/