Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7 and nice +19

[Ed Tomlinson]

On January 13, 2002 10:45 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > With pre3+H7, kernel compiles still take 40% longer with a setiathome
> > process running at nice +19.  This is _not_ the case with the old
> > scheduler.
>
> Did you try to set MIN_TIMESLICE to 10 ( sched.h ) ?make bzImage with setiathome running nice +19

This makes things a worst - note the decreased cpu utilizaton...
  
make bzImage  424.33s user 32.21s system 48% cpu 15:48.69 total

What is this telling us?  

Ed Tomlinson

>>make bzImage  391.11s user 30.85s system 62% cpu 11:17.37 total
>>
>>make bzImage alone
>>
>>make bzImage  397.33s user 32.14s system 92% cpu 7:43.58 total
>>
>>Notice the large difference in run times...