Hi,
I have watched this thread, and I am unable to understand what problems
people have with a autoconfigurator!
Eric, go ahead and produce an autoconfigurator. If it works, it will become a
useful tool for those who need it. It will not interfere with the current
practice of manual kernel configuration and will not cause any inconvenience
to developers. And it will be useful!
Think of it in the context of a magic "Build-me-an-optimised-kernel" button
which would appear on the desktop of distro X. Which could be useful.
The point is, people who have no need for an autoconfig tool need not use it.
Melvin configures manually.
Aunt Tillie uses her distro kernels.
The small group of people who have the knowledge/requirement to build their
own kernels, but without sufficent technical knowhow to configure it, and
understand some myriad options, will find the autoconfig tool useful. And
Linux is about covering all the groups, is it not?
Just my 0.02 euro.
*MatthewM*
- --
Paranoia is heightened awareness.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8RJhcoVQMDIAmueURAiMEAKCOP6jgj9/6LEhdXY9X2hnpNAslWQCeIwV6
K86eai2Nl5xtmuu92NbRbZA=
=JV5M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/