Re: Hardwired drivers are going away?

Frank van de Pol (fvdpol@home.nl)
Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:20:41 +0100


On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:22:43AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:20:02 -0500 (EST),
> "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com> wrote:
> > Linux doesn't have a method to load encrypted & signed modules at
> > this time .
>
> And never will. Who loads the module - root. Who maintains the list
> of signatures - root. Who controls the code that verifies the
> signature - root.
>
> Your task Jim, should you choose to accept it, is to make the kernel
> distinguish between a good use of root and a malicious use by some who
> has broken in and got root privileges. When you can do that, then we
> can add signed modules.
>

If you want to secure your box, why don't you simply put a lock on it and
throw away the key? Really, what might help the paranoid admins in this case
is a setting in the kernel which basically disables the ability to load or
unload modules. Of course once set this setting can not been turned with
rebooting the box.

Frank.

-- 
+---- --- -- -  -   -    - 
| Frank van de Pol                  -o)    A-L-S-A
| FvdPol@home.nl                    /\\  Sounds good!
| http://www.alsa-project.org      _\_v
| Linux - Why use Windows if we have doors available?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/