Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch

J Sloan (jjs@lexus.com)
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:19:06 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory 2.4.7-10"
Previous message: Tim Moore: "Re: Disk corruption - Abit KT7, 2.2.19+ide patches"
Maybe in reply to: J Sloan: "Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch"

Oops, braino - if anyone is curious about the
graphs even after seeing the raw histograms,
they are at

ftp://wintermute.toyota.com/pub/graphs

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory 2.4.7-10"
Previous message: Tim Moore: "Re: Disk corruption - Abit KT7, 2.2.19+ide patches"
Maybe in reply to: J Sloan: "Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch"