Re: [ACPI] ACPI mentioned on lwn.net/kernel

Andreas Schwab (schwab@suse.de)
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:15:46 +0100


Ryan Cumming <bodnar42@phalynx.dhs.org> writes:

|> On January 25, 2002 07:50, Horst von Brand wrote:
|> > > Given that the MS VC compiler consistently generates IA-32 code that is
|> > > over 30% smaller than GCC, I would have to say that Linux would benefit
|> > > far more by directing all of the energy spent complaining about code size
|> > > toward optimizing the compiler.
|> >
|> > Is it faster too? Or at least not slower? If not, what is the point?
|>
|> Storing 30% less executable pages in memory? Reading 30% less executable
|> pages off the disk?

These are all startup costs that are lost in the noise the longer the
program runs.

|> Performing 30% less relocations?

30% less code does not imply 30% less relocations.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/