Re: Why 'linux/fs.h' cannot be included? I *can*...

[Alan Cox]

> Your libc should provide a "sanitized" version of the kernel headers,
> which is completely separate from any kernel sources.
> 
> dietlibc does this...  it's completely independent of kernel header changes.
> 
> RedHat will be doing this with glibc in the future.

We already do. Red Hat shipped since about 7.0 has a seperate set of
kernel based headers that glibc uses for its own internal use, and the set
in the kernel sources.

Alan