Re: [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> It's still a question whether we'll want to use 128 as
> the branch factor or another number ... but I'm sure
> somebody will figure that out (and it can be changed
> later, it's just one define).

Actually, I think the big question is whether somebody is willing to clean
up and fix the "move_from_swap_cache()" issue with block_flushpage.

		Linus