I rerun the testcases, this time the 2.4.18-pre8 did not go as deep - and
survived. But had worse performance - then I remembered... I had added
file readahead. Retested again - it still survived...
echo "file_readahead:255"> /proc/ide/hda/settings
The results from all tested kernels standard and with readahead follows...
2.4.18pre7
start: with 'bi' at 12000
after awhile 'bi' hovers at 7000-9000 (sporadic swap outs)
after yet some time it starts to swap in too - but without performance loss
2.4.18pre7 with file_readahead:255
start: bi at 15000-18000
after awhile heavy swap out: 600(!)-10000
after yet some time, now with swap in too: 1000-6000
2.4.18pre7 w. Ed Tomlinsons patch
start: bi at 12000
stays at: 9000-12000
more swapout causes throughput loss: 5000-9000
but finally stabilizes at 7000-10000
2.4.18pre7 w. Ed Tomlinsons patch and file_readahead
start: bi at 15000-23000
...
rather soon ends up in both swapping in and out...
(about the same throughput at 2.4.18pre7)
2.4.17rmap12c
during the whole testrun: bi at 10000-12000
exept for some short dips downto at most 8000
2.4.17rmap12c with file_readahead
during whole testrun: bi at 20000-23000
short dips downto 16000 (once 9000)
This should be a picture, but... some other day...
/RogerL
-- Roger Larsson Skellefteå Sweden - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/