Re: The IBM order relaxation patch

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:55:20 -0200 (BRST)


On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> > This looks hard to fix with the current mm layer. Maybe Rik's
> > rmap method could help here, because with reverse mappings we
> > can at least try to free adjacent areas (because we then at least
> > *know* who's using the pages).
>
> Yes, that's one of leading reasons for wanting rmap. (Number one and
> two reasons are: allow forcible unmapping of multiply referenced pages
> for swapout; get more reliable hardware ref bit readings.)

It's still on my TODO list. Patches are very much welcome
though ;)

Rik

-- 
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/