Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5

Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:27:14 +0100 (CET)


On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Quite a few. Significant ones. pagemap_lru_lock and lru_list_lock
> come to mind.

ugh. Are you sure we want to *sleep* with something like pagemap_lru_lock
held? That pretty much brings all pagecache related operations to a
grinding halt. I think complex spinlocked sections should be simplified
rather.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/