Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5
yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:02:19 -0700
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:57:19PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
> >
> > llseek:
> > atomic_enquee request
> > if no room gotta sleep
> > else if trylock mutex
> > return
> > else
> > do work
> > loop:
> > process any pending requests
> > release lock;
> > if pending_requests && !(trylock mutex) goto loop
>
> This is how printk() works. It was a very powerful and satisfactory
> solution to a nasty locking/atomicity problem. It'd be nice to have
> a more generic way of expressing that solution.
note how I put in the goto so Ingo would be more happy with it -)
>
> -
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/