That was my first need (%N.core is what I used on a different platform)
However, being able to specify a few more items really provides much more
> A patch was included in the kernel some time ago, to allow the appending of the
> PID - however, this is not really good enough. It's better than nothing, but
> it's not good.
> What I want is "core.[process name]" eventually with a ".[pid]" appended. A
> flexible scheme like your patch implements is very nice. Actually having
> the core files in CWD is fine for me - I mainly care about the file name.
> Furthermore, the patch that went in earlier is *horrible* code. Let me give a
> few examples:
I had noticed that - it was rather poor - and rather strange. I hope
people like my patch a bit better.
-- Michael Sinz ---- Worldgate Communications ---- firstname.lastname@example.org A master's secrets are only as good as the master's ability to explain them to others. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/