> On Saturday 16 February 2002 11:06 am, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Don't tell us that's not doable. Do it and show us that you can do a
> > perfect translation of CML1 into CML2 with all CML1 structural flaws.
> "Hey, the new VM in 2.4.10 should have replicated the swap overload failure
> case in 2.4.9! The first implementation should definitely melt down exactly
> the same way! We need to artificially introduce all the flaws in the old
> one, just to prove it can be done! Otherwise the new code is not
Please read my other mails, understand the nuances, then come back, OK?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/