Re: ENOTTY from ext3 code?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 01:23:01 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes."
Previous message: Wade Hampton: "Info on Intel Plumas E7500 support"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: ENOTTY from ext3 code?"

> if that is your concern. Personally, I think "Not a typewriter"
> was a warmer and fuzzier reference to the roots, but oh well...
> Dennis giveth, TOG taketh away...

TOG says you are right. -ENOTTY is the right thing in most cases
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes."
Previous message: Wade Hampton: "Info on Intel Plumas E7500 support"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: ENOTTY from ext3 code?"