Re: bug(?): SET_PERSONALITY 2.4.18-rc3

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:00:27 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: James A. Lupo: "PROBLEM: Compile of 8139too.c fails in kernel 2.4.18-rc3"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: is CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP always a win?"

From: Tom Gall <tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:50:08 -0600

otherwise a static application would be run without SET_PERSONALITY
being called, which On ppc64, very quickly leads to a bad day.

This is also breaking static 32-bit apps on sparc64.
Thanks for finding this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James A. Lupo: "PROBLEM: Compile of 8139too.c fails in kernel 2.4.18-rc3"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: is CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP always a win?"