Re: [PATCH] Lightweight userspace semaphores...

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:48:58 -0800 (PST)


On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > sys_sem_create()
> > sys_sem_destroy()
>
> There is no create and destroy (init is purely userspace). There is
> "this is a semapore: up it". This is a feature.

No, that's a bug.

You have to realize that there are architectures that need special
initialization and page allocation for semaphores: they need special flags
in the TLB for "careful access", for example (sometimes the careful access
ends up being non-cached).

You can't just put semaphores anywhere and tell the kernel to try to fix
up whatever happened.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/