Re: schedule()

Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:13:20 -0800 (PST)


On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

>
>
> I just read on this list that:
>
> while(something)
> {
> current->policy |= SCHED_YIELD;
> schedule();
> }
>
> Will no longer be allowed in a kernel module! If this is true, how
> do I loop, waiting for a bit in a port, without wasting CPU time?
>
> A lot of hardware does not generate interrupts upon a condition,
> there is no CPU activity that could send a wake_up_interruptible()
> to something sleeping.
>
> For instance, I need to write data to a hardware FIFO, one long-word
> at a time, but I can't just write. I have to wait for a bit to be
> set or reset for each and every write. I'm going to be burning a
> lot of CPU cycles if I can't schedule() while the trickle-down-effect
> of the hardware is happening.

What did it do yield() to you ? Doesn't it work for your case ?

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/