Are you able to leverage the new EA interface? (Which I still don't like
because of the namespace syntax embedded in the attribute names, btw,
please don't misinterpret silence as happiness.)
> o The ability to do online filesystem dumps which are coherent with
> the system call interface
It would be nice if some other filesystems could share that mechanism, do
you think it's feasible? If not, what's the stumbling block? I haven't
looked at this for some time and there's was some furious work going on
exactly there just before 2.5. It seems we've at least progressed a
little from the viewpoint that nobody would want that.
> o delayed allocation of file data
Andrew Morton is working on generic delayed allocation at the vfs level I
believe, why not bang heads with him and see if it can be made to work with
VFS?
> o DMAPI
It would be nice to have unsucky file events. But there's been roughly zero
discussion of dmapi on lkml as far as I can see.
> As it is we did all of these, and we seem to have half the Linux NAS
> vendors in the world building xfs into their boxes.
True enough.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/