Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:14:31 -0300 (BRT)


On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> > or (c) have proponents of the inclusion of the O(1) scheduler
> > fix all drivers before having the O(1) scheduler considered
> > for inclusion.
>
> According to find and grep the patch in general use does precisely that
> except for Andrea's yield loops on init kill funnies that still lurk in
> the non x86 parts of rmap. If rmap doesnt need them I guess they should go ?

Absolutely.

Rik

-- 
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/