Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
5 Mar 2002 15:14:19 -0800


Followup to: <20020305230143.GB5538@matchmail.com>
By author: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> IIRC, bitkeeper, is open source. It just doesn't have a free license. I
> could be wrong(I haven't checked). If I am, someone will say so...
>

A free license is a necessary, but not sufficient, requirement for
something to be Open Source.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/