Re: [PATCH] 2.5: preemptive kernel on UP

[Robert Love]

On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:17, george anzinger wrote:

> With out a lot of looking, wouldn't it be easier to just change fork?

Don't we need to unlock the rq regardless of what fork does?

Also, the alternative would be to set preempt_count to 0 if
CONFIG_PREEMPT and 1 if CONFIG_PREEMPT && CONFIG_SMP.  I figured Linus
would balk at that sort #if/#else in do_fork.  And, even then, is it
safe to start the task with a preempt_count of 0?

	Robert Love