> I am considering adding some enhancements to CVS to address deficiencies
> which adversely affect my productivity.
> ... I would like to know what the Bitkeeper users consider the minimum
> acceptable set of improvements that CVS would require for broader
> acceptance.
1) working merges
2) atomic checkins of entire patches, fast tags
3) graphical 2-way merging tool like bitkeeper has
(this might not seem essential to people who have
never used it, but it has saved me many many hours)
4) distributed repositories
5) ability to exchange changesets by email
regards,
Rik
-- <insert bitkeeper endorsement here>http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/