Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers

[Sean Hunter]

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:39:21PM -0800, Stephen Samuel wrote:
>=20
> note: this solution DOES NOT PRECLUDE YOU (or anybody else) FROM
> USING BITKEEPER (or any other proprietary solution) in the privacy of
> your office and/or home -- even if you want to do Linux development
> with it.  It's simply about what occurs in the OFFICIAL Linux kernel
> code tree, which probably has a reasonably high proportion of people
> who are both politically and financially sensitive to the idea of
> being almost required to use an closed source product to work on
> their open source 'baby'.
>=20

You left off:

  We support your right to have babies, even though you can't have=20
     babies, which is nobodies fault, not even Larry McVoy's.

Thanks for giving everyone your permission to use bitkeeper in the privacy =
of
their own home.  Its nice to know you think anyone gives a fuck about your
opinion. Now kindly sod off and stop wasting everybodies time.

Sean

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8iG6+AgJf0xrWsZwRAv3CAJ9jcAbRAOMQZmFdgu/OH+kR1h7OPACgkXvA
670On2JLq9SrI8wdJSQj554=
=B2rI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--