Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing

Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:51:16 +0300


yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:

>On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:15:38AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>>>The problem is that it doesn't play well with other things.
>>>
>>Your statement is information free so far, but could be the intro to an
>>informative statement....;-)
>>
>
>e.g. link, copy, remove.
>
In what respect do these not play well?

>
>
>
>Look at the Plan9 backup plan. That was much better thought out.
>
Also not enough said to be informative., but could be an introduction to
an informative statement.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/