> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > Its quite different to other goings on
>
> Alan, did you actually look at the diffs that Martin sent out, or are you
> just reacting to the description?
>
> I think you read more into the description than was actually in the patch
> itself.
>
> Rule #1: always read the patch.
>
> Right now, that patch definitely needs to learn to use "yield()" instead
> of "schedule()" etc details, but I really don't understand why all the
> brouhaha over Martins patches.
>
> Am I really the only one who actually reads the actual _changes_ instead
> of arguing over personal issues?
>
> Now, I've long had this theory that IDE coding is bad for your mental
> health (you won't ever see _me_ going close to the dang thing - I'll use
> it, but I won't start writing code for it), but that theory used to be a
> _joke_, for chrissake! Don't make it appear a truism.
Are you, by any chance, confusing my AMD IDE changes with Pavel Machek's
first attempt at IDE wake/suspend code?
Gee, I think we all need some calming down and sleep ...
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/