Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Node affine NUMA scheduler

Gerrit Huizenga (gh@us.ibm.com)
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:00:18 -0800


Beware of optimizing for the benchmark. In real life, exec is likely
a much better place for the balancing.

gerrit

In message <Pine.LNX.4.21.0203141709310.12844-100000@sx6.ess.nec.de>, > : Erich
Focht writes:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Erich Focht wrote:
>
> > the task is currently running. Hackbench might slow down a bit but
> > AIM7 should improve.
>
> Grrr, AIM7 doesn't exec(), either :-( , so no initial balancing is
> done. I'll take that back into do_fork()...
>
> Regards,
> Erich
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lse-tech mailing list
> Lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/