Re: [patch] ns83820 0.17 (Re: Broadcom 5700/5701 Gigabit Ethernet Adapters)

Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:56:11 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alexander Trotsai: "udf broken (may be)"
Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.1-pre5: per-cpu areas"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Severe IRQ problems on Foster (P4 Xeon) system"

On March 14, 2002 09:37 pm, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > 4) Do you really mean to allocate memory for "REAL_RX_BUF_SIZE + 16"?
> > Why not plain old REAL_RX_BUF_SIZE?
>
> The +16 is for alignment (just like the comment says). The hardware
> requires that rx buffers be 64 bit aligned.

Nit: that would be REAL_RX_BUF_SIZE + 15.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Trotsai: "udf broken (may be)"
Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.1-pre5: per-cpu areas"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Severe IRQ problems on Foster (P4 Xeon) system"