Re: fadvise syscall?
Ken Hirsch (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:35:35 -0500
Anton Altaparmakov writes
> Posix or not I still don't see why one would want that. You know what you
> are going to be using a file for at open time and you are not going to be
> changing your mind later. If you can show me a single _real_world_ example
> where one would genuinely want to change from one access pattern to
> without closing/reopening a particular file I would agree that fadvise is
> good idea but otherwise I think open(2) is the superior approach.
Sure, a database manager can change the access pattern on every query. If
there's an index and not too many records are expected to match, it will use
a random pattern, otherwise it will use sequential access.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/