Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3

John Levon (movement@marcelothewonderpenguin.com)
Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:33:43 +0100


On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 06:42:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> > And, unless this is reversed the OpenAFS kernel module won't load (it
> > needs sys_call_table.):
>
> Correct. There was agreement a very long time ago that code should not patch
> the syscall table (for one its not safe). AFS probably needs fixing so the
> AFS syscall hook is exported portably and nicely in the syscall code.

Sure, AFS can do that ...

But what about the recent discussion on the removal of sys_call_table ?

(I believe it was along the lines of "it's ugly, prevent it ...", "ah,
but it has real uses, so why can't it stay as deprecated/unadvised ?"
"*no response*").

I'm a bit disappointed this has just gone in without any real discussion
on the usefulness of this for certain circumstances :(

regards
john

-- 
"I never understood what's so hard about picking a unique
 first and last name - and not going beyond the 6 character limit."
 	- Toon Moene
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/