Re: [prepatch] address_space-based writeback

Anton Altaparmakov (aia21@cam.ac.uk)
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:56:41 +0100


At 22:44 10/04/02, Andrew Morton wrote:
>When a page is marked dirty, the path which is followed
>is page->mapping->host->i_sb. So in this case the page will
>be attached to its page->mapping.dirty_pages, and
>page->mapping->host will be attached to page->mapping->host->i_sb.s_dirty
>
>This is as it always was - I didn't change any of this.

Um, NTFS uses address spaces for things where ->host is not an inode at all
so doing host->i_sb will give you god knows what but certainly not a super
block!

As long as your patches don't break that is possible to have I am happy...
But from what you are saying above I have a bad feeling you are somehow
assuming that a mapping's host is an inode...

Anton

-- 
   "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/
IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net / ICQ: 8561279
WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/