Re: [PATCH] Futex Generalization Patch

Hubertus Franke (frankeh@watson.ibm.com)
Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:46:24 -0400


On Monday 15 April 2002 04:57 pm, Mark Mielke wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:22:59PM -0400, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > typedef struct siginfo {
> > ...
> > union {
> > int _pad[SI_PAD_SIZE];
> >
> > struct {
> > ...
> > } _kill;
> > ...
> >
> > I'd suggest we tag along the _sigfault semantics.
> > We don't need to know who woke us up, just which <addr> got signalled.
>
> Is there issues with creating a new struct in the union that represents
> exactly what you wish it to represent?
>
> mark

No, but then again there seems to be no need either.
All we need is the <addr> that is to be woken up, which
carries similarity to a SEGV signal handler.

-- 
-- Hubertus Franke  (frankeh@watson.ibm.com)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/