Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Daniel Phillips (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:46:57 +0200
On Sunday 21 April 2002 17:33, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:30:38AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> > > > Maybe I was to subtle, but your censorship argument is simply bullshit.
> > > > A link to the information is completely sufficient.
> > >
> > > What was Daniel's action? Remove the text. Nothing else. Sure, he
> > > suggested other options, but he did attempt to implement them? No.
> > Be realistic - how is he supposed to do that?
> It's really trivial to put a document up on a Web site, before
> submitting a patch to remove said document. Or to contact someone, and
> get them to post the doc.
> Did he even attempt to do that? No.
You're wrong. I suggested posting the documents on the bitkeeper site among
other things and Larry agreed to do that. What do you think I should have done,
demanded that Larry do that?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/