Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Ian Molton (spyro@armlinux.org)
Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:36:33 +0100


Daniel Phillips Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> A steady slide toward proprietary tools and behind-the-scenes development
> in cathedral-style is an issue.

Whilst Im not sure I agree that bitkeeper is going to push things 'behind
the scenes' (its a source management tool, not the source itself), I do
think the basic point being made here has some merit. Think about it...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/