Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

[Jeff Garzik]

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:05:40PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Good point.  Perhaps we extend this idea to: A patch goes into the tree that
> really should have been discussed but wasn't, now we know who to beat up.
> Err, like the BK documentation patch.

I of course question that said patch needed to be discussed beyond the
discussion that already occurred (admittedly in private)

But yep.  You know who to beat up about these things :)

	Jeff