Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:33:57 +0200


On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 10:03:31AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> http://ftp.??.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/dwmw2/bk-2.5/
> http://ftp.??.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/
>
> The individual patches look sane - I'm not entirely sure about the 'Full
> patch' version, which seems to contain stuff not in the individual patches.

Just an added vote of confidence,..
They looked sane enough that I used them to sync my tree up to a few
csets short of 2.5.9 over the weekend, (after 2.5.9 final I diffed the
tree with csets -> 2.5.9 and then merged that).

The only time this method of me keeping up with Linus falls over is when
files move or are deleted. No patch seems to be deleted there, so
there's nothing for me to apply.. I can live with this though.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/