Re: [patch] 2.5.9 remove warnings

Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:56:22 +0200

On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:08:08PM +0200, Kasper Dupont wrote:
> Wouldn't "!!(x)" make more sense here than "(x) != 0"?
> (I don't like comparing pointers with integers.)

No, == 0 means, that the pointer is invalid, so != 0 means, the
pointer is valid. You can find this in the C99-Standard at least.

So, this is perfectly normal ;-)

Regards

Ingo Oeser

-- 
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/