Re: [PATCH] SIGURG incorrectly delivered to process

David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:59:19 -0700

>>>>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:52:32 +1000, Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org> said:

Christopher> If a process is sent a SIGURG signal and it is blocking
Christopher> SIGURG signals, when the process subsequently unblocks
Christopher> SIGURG signals it will be terminated even if it is set
Christopher> to the default action (SIG_DFL) which is specified by
Christopher> SUSv3 to ignore that signal.

Looks like a correct fix to me. I made this change to the ia64 tree.

Thanks,

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/