> Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > Uz.ytkownik Sebastian Droege napisa?:
> >
> >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:41:30 +0200
> >> Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> @@ -584,27 +585,25 @@
> >> drive->failures = 0;
> >> } else {
> >> drive->failures++;
> >> + char *msg = "";
> >>
> >> My compiler won't compile that ;)
> >> Declare msg after the function's beginning and it compiles fine
> >
> >
> > Well it doesn't has to be the function it sufficient to be
> > the beginng of a block. However this is puzzling me,
> > becouse the gcc-3.1 snap eats the above just like if it
> > where a C++ complier!!!
> Note the "mixed declarations and code" @
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-3.0/c99status.html
And see the -std= option for selecting what ou want it to conform to.
MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/