Re: PATCH, IDE corruption, 2.4.18

Andre Hedrick (andre@linux-ide.org)
Sat, 4 May 2002 17:47:04 -0700 (PDT)


It is not a problem in 2.5, you have a worse one.

NO DMA TIMEOUT RECOVERY -- woohoo ...........

On Sat, 4 May 2002, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 01:15:20PM +0100, Neil Conway wrote:
> > - byte stat;
> > + byte stat,unit;
>
> [snip]
>
> > #if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA) && !defined(CONFIG_DMA_NONPCI)
> > - byte unit = (drive->select.b.unit & 0x01);
> > + unit = (drive->select.b.unit & 0x01);
>
> Why are you moving the init of "unit" out of that ifdef?
>
> Can you see if this problem is still in 2.5 also?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/