Re: 2.5.13 IDE and preemptible kernel problems

Martin Dalecki (dalecki@evision-ventures.com)
Sun, 05 May 2002 02:24:07 +0200


Użytkownik Linus Torvalds napisał:
>
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
>
>>Uz.ytkownik Andi Kleen napisa?:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>When booting an preemptible kernel 2.5.13 kernel on x86-64 I get
>>>very quickly an scheduling in interrupt BUG. It looks like the
>>>preempt_count becomes 0 inside the ATA interrupt handler. This
>>>could happen when save_flags/restore_flags and friends are unmatched
>>>and you have too many flags restores in IDE.
>>
>>Thank you for pointing out. I will re check it.
>
>
> Martin, may I suggest that the next line of cleanups should be to remove
> all vestiges of the old global interrupt locking from the IDE driver?
> Including, for example, the crap "PCI method 1" access stuff in CMD640x..
>
> Also, if you turn on spinlock debugging, that tends to help find the
> really silly things faster (leaving the harder races to be solved by
> brainforce ;)

OK, lest's make a deal you do the following and - realize
immediately that there is a need for single argument
time_past() or whatever and I turn spinlock debugging on :-).

[root@kozaczek linux]# find ./ -name "*.[ch]" -exec grep time_after /dev/null {}
\; | wc
265 1638 21285
[root@kozaczek linux]# find ./ -name "*.[ch]" -exec grep time_after /dev/null {}
\; | grep jiffies | wc
239 1497 19080
[root@kozaczek linux]#

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/