> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:49:12AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > have little time to fix it. I say pull it from
> > > 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please...
> > > it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again.
> > Okay, what about the following:
> > Are you willing to start being the khttp maintainer?
> > I have not seen updates or any attempts at maintaining the
> > thing in about 2 years. Basically, since it went into the
> > tree.
> > If we aren't changing that situation, we are not removing
> > the impetus for taking khttpd out of the tree entirely.
> If khttpd is out-of-tree I volunteer for collecting patches if that
> is enough for the maintainer status. But I have to admit that I don't
> really care for it..
I do care, but I have no time at all.
Onestly, I do not think I am the only one using khttpd fruitfully, but I
tend to suspect that people using it are more silent in front of people
who do not care for it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/