Re: Changelogs on kernel.org

Brian C. Huffman (sheep@graze.net)
12 May 2002 01:05:44 -0400


Generally the defense that "no one else is saying anything" is not a
good one - especially b/c it opens up a huge space for others to agree
with the original argument. And yes, they are illegible.

In fact, I believe that when things originally moved to BK, there was
some discussion that although it was a step in the right direction, it
needed to be cleaned up a little bit.

-Brian

On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 21:09, john slee wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:09AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > I dont know who to write to about this, but the changelogs for
> > 2.4.19-pre on kernel.org are COMPLETELY illegible.
>
> you seem to be the only one publicly complaining. go write a procmail
> recipe to fix them up.
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/