Re: InfiniBand BOF @ LSM - topics of interest

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 22:01, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
 
> The thing about Infiniband is that its scope is so great.
> If you consider Infiniband was only a glorified PCI with serial
> connector, the congestion control is not an issue. Credits
> are quite sufficient to provide per link flow control, and
> everything would work nicely with a couple of switches.
> Such was the original plan, anyways, but somehow cluster
> ninjas managed to hijack the spec and we have the rabid
> overengineering running amok. In fact, they ran so far
> that Intel jumped ship and created PCI Express, and we
> have discussions about congestion control. Sad, really...
> 
> -- Pete
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This sounds like deja vu all over again.
Each new interconnect technology like ATM seems to go through the cycle:

	Assert: all other network protocols are crap
	Deny: history
	Assert: our problem is different, therefore we must
	        reinvent everything from data transfer up to 		applications

	Reality strikes!

	New technology ends up being used with standard applications and
	protocols.