Re: Bug with shared memory.

Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Fri, 17 May 2002 13:53:10 -0400 (EDT)


On Wed, 15 May 2002, Mike Kravetz wrote:

> It appears that this was done for 'sparc64', but no other architectures.
> I would consider doing this for i386, if anyone would actually use it.
>
> One would think these types of things are easily found, but this example
> suggests otherwise. Has anyone run the kernel through an extensive
> (stress) test suite with any of the kernel debug options enabled?

Does this imply that the option:
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
doesn't work on x86? Or works poorly? I'm not sure what changes you're
proposing, but if they will make this more robust I'll certainly use them!
SMP lockups are the bane of my existance, although
19-pre8-ac4+preempt+iowait has yet to take that route.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/