xx- a/drivers/video/cyber2000fb.c Wed May 29 11:43:02 2002
xx+ b/drivers/video/cyber2000fb.c Wed May 29 11:43:02 2002
@@ -1729,9 +1729,8 @@
}
static struct pci_device_id cyberpro_pci_table[] __devinitdata = {
-// Not yet
-// { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_1682,
-// PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ID_IGA_1682 },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_1682,
+ PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ID_IGA_1682 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_2000,
PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ID_CYBERPRO_2000 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_2010,
This is completely wrong - the driver has been tested NOT to work on
the Integraphics 1682. As such, please do uncomment these lines.
In addition, I'm disappointed that no one forwarded the patch for
maintainer approval PRIOR to submitting it to Linus.
Linus, I request that you apply the following patch. Thanks.
--- orig/drivers/video/cyber2000fb.c Mon May 6 16:54:10 2002
+++ linux/drivers/video/cyber2000fb.c Mon May 13 10:48:13 2002
@@ -1729,8 +1729,9 @@
}
static struct pci_device_id cyberpro_pci_table[] __devinitdata = {
- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_1682,
- PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ID_IGA_1682 },
+// Not yet
+// { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_1682,
+// PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ID_IGA_1682 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_2000,
PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ID_CYBERPRO_2000 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTERG, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTERG_2010,
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/