>
>
>Then for each model you would define its generic CONFIG_M<arch>, and
>the specific features not contained in the generic. And then define
>the rest of features based on generic.
>The CONFIG_M<arch> would serve as a flag for 'this cpu has all features
>of a generic xxx'.
>
>Or if you are worried about namespace pollution these could be named
>CONFIG_CPU_VENDOR_, CONFIG_CPU_, CONFIG_CPU_M.
>
>
Your division of categories (snipped from above quoted) seems ok.
The basic thing to remember is that "generic_foo" or "cpu_intel_foo"
options should very rarely, if ever, appear in the config.in or sources.
We simply want to use the generic or cpu-specific user selection to
determine (a) compiler flags, (b) CONFIG_xxx symbols for specific CPU
features and optimizations, [like CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG] and maybe (c)
enable and disable CPU-specific drivers. (c) will be a special case,
since very few drivers should require a specific CPU type... but some
drivers simply don't work on 386.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/